To ban or not to ban auto-rickshaws

The recent decision to ban auto-rickshaws from the main roads in Bangladesh has triggered significant debate. Proponents argue that removing auto-rickshaws - often criticised for erratic driving - will streamline traffic flow for larger vehicles and public transport.

However, critics point to deeper systemic issues that remain unresolved, including inadequate infrastructure, inefficient traffic management, and the rising number of private vehicles. Moreover, the ban disproportionately affects low-income commuters who rely on auto-rickshaws as an affordable mode of transport, as well as the drivers who depend on them for their livelihoods.

The environmental impact adds another dimension to the debate. Auto-rickshaws, particularly those powered by compressed natural gas (CNG), are more environmentally friendly than older vehicles running on petrol or diesel. Removing them could inadvertently worsen urban air quality in cities already struggling with severe pollution.

Experts propose alternative solutions, such as stricter regulations, improved traffic management, and the introduction of designated lanes for auto-rickshaws. Expanding and enhancing public transport options could also help reduce dependence on smaller vehicles. While the goals of reducing traffic congestion and improving road safety are commendable, a more balanced approach is required to address the broader social, economic, and environmental implications of this policy.

Md. Farhan Sadique

BBA

North South University

farhan.sadique@northsouth.edu