Controllers of the world carry on

They have not finished with Egypt's ousted President Hosni Mubarak --- not yet. Two months after the long-drawn out Tahrir Square spectacle, the 'revolutionaries' are at it again, gathering in 'tens of thousands' for weekly protests, demanding that he and his sons be brought to trial for alleged corruption, and violence following the Jan 25 eruption of Egyptian angst. Last Saturday a deadly clash ensued as soldiers tried to disperse the crowd that was determined to demonstrate all night. By Monday, April 11, defiant protesters stayed put in the now-famous square, accusing army commanders of complicity with the 82-year old former president. In an audio message aired on the pan-Arab television network Al Arabiya, Hosni Mubarak maintained that he was a 'victim of a smear campaign' and seemed to have angered the agitators further with a threat to take out lawsuits against those guilty of slandering him, although he did promise to assist a 'probe' of his foreign assets. It remains to be seen how the drama unfolds. Meanwhile it would perhaps be worth the while to consider what some seeded observers and analysts have to say regarding the ouster of the Egyptian strongman who used to be so valued by the west once upon a time. Or the other upheavals in the Middle East and North Africa. According to Webster G Tarpley, not known for mincing his words, 'there never was an Egyptian revolution', but rather a 'behind-the-scene military putsch by a junta of CIA puppet generals.' The reason why Mubarak fell from grace is that he 'opposed the current US-UK plan to organize a block of Sunni Arab states such as Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and the Gulf States ---- under a US nuclear umbrella and shoulder to shoulder with Israel ---- for purposes of confrontation and war with Iran, Syria, Hezbollah, and their Shiite and radical allies.' The US brought down Mubarak because he became increasingly vocal against the overall direction of American policy , particularly in the planned regional alliance against Iran and its allies. The creation of Islamic chimeras in the Arab world --- radicals on the one hand and a moderate Arab bloc on the other ---- had reduced states into nothing better than pawns to be played wit, and Mubarak, in his ripe old age was trying to do something about the situation. Last year Mubarak inaugurated direct flights between Cairo and Tehran ending a 30-year non-communication. And he also wanted Iran, the main US target, to 'become part of a solution to the middle East crisis, rather than being one of the causes of problems.' He was also vehemently opposed to the 'nuclear umbrella' plan that meant the creation of military bases in Egypt. The apparently popular Egyptian agitation, according to Tarpley, was actually staged by the standard destabilization tactics under the auspices of the CIA/National Endowment for Democracy. Writing from Washington DC, Feb 18,2011, Tarpley explains how the Egyptian upheaval began. It was exclusively a gathering of the privileged youth, belonging to the upper middle classes,those with access to the Internet, Google, Facebook and Twitter, in Tahrir Square, ' where they provided a photo opportunity for the Al Jazeera television, which shamelessly served as the demagogic speaking tube of British intelligence, the former colonial power in Egypt.' Although there seemed to be a core group of agitators united merely in their hatred of Mubarak and the desire for entire regime change, the political consciousness of this leadership was of such a 'pathetic and primitive level', says Tarpley, that they ' could never hope to determine events, but was always condemned to become the tool of some organized force which actually knew what it wanted ---- such as the CIA.' There was no real mass organization capable of seizing power and no programme of economic reconstruction, development and reform which could have united the larger sectors of the Egyptian population. But that is not what their minders wanted. The goal rather is to use the restive youth bulge in the region to advance the megalomaniacal American Empire Project ---- which is, to control the entire world. And in this, says Tarpley, their indispensable allies are 'ignorance, stupidity, gullibility, and the willingness to be blinded by hatred.' Consider Brzezinski's boastful interview, given to Newsweek during the first few weeks into the Egyptian destabilization, about his ability to manipulate the youth bulge. His tools are ' somewhere between 80 million and 130 million young people around the world who come from the socially insecure lower middle class and constitute a community of mutual infection with angers, passions, frustrations, and hatreds. These students are revolutionaries-in-waiting. When they erupt at volatile moments, they become contagious. And whereas Marx's industrial protelariat more than a century ago was fragmented in local groups, today these young people are interacting via the Internet.' This is straight from the horse mouth, one who has been always found boasting about people with superior scientific know-how controlling the world.