Restoring dignity of parliament

Parliament is the highest forum of democratic deliberation, where national policies are debated, government actions are scrutinised and public aspirations are voiced. Unfortunately, parliamentary debates in Bangladesh are increasingly becoming a source of public disappointment. Personal attacks, inflammatory remarks, offensive language, excessive partisan rhetoric, and performative speeches often overshadow meaningful discussion on legislation, governance and issues affecting citizens. The frequent expunging of remarks from parliamentary records further highlights the decline in the quality of debate.
As the country's principal democratic institution, Parliament sets the tone for national political discourse. When elected representatives resort to slogans instead of substance and insults instead of reasoned argument, they weaken democratic culture and erode public confidence in institutions. The quality of parliamentary debate is a reflection of the maturity of a democracy.
MPs carry an extraordinary responsibility. Every statement made here has the potential to influence public opinion, national debate and social cohesion. Words spoken in parliament should be guided by evidence, restraint, respect and relevance.
At the same time, parliament is ultimately a reflection of society that elects it. Higher standards cannot be expected from representatives if voters continue to reward divisive rhetoric and political spectacle over competence, integrity and accountability. Democratic responsibility begins at the ballot box.
Bangladesh deserves a parliament remembered for its ideas, innovation and effectiveness rather than controversy and confrontation. Restoring dignity, civility and substance to parliamentary debate is essential for strengthening democratic governance and rebuilding public trust.

Md. Yeasir Arafat
Student
Department of Political Science
University of Rajshahi