Satanic interventions of berserk imperialists

The mainstream media's (read dominant western groups) pathological glee at the fall of Libya's Muammar Gaddafi on October 20, 2011, seems to be somewhat tempered lately, now that the analyses of conscientious people across the globe are getting the attention they deserve. 'We hope he can be captured or killed soon', said the breezy US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, while addressing a gathering of students in Tripoli on 18 October, just a couple of days before the satanic lynching of the fallen strongman by berserk US-NATO sponsored rebels. 'Global Research' postings tell us that covert elements from the illustrious US-NATO alliance have been operating on Libyan soil, many, many months before the actual rebellion erupted, giving the lie to the illusion that the rebellion was spontaneous. What is more revealing is that the backbone of the 'pro-democracy' show is composed of 'former' al-Qaeda affiliates, the very same against whom the whole satanic game of 'war on terror' has been set up! And now we hear Libya's Transitional leader, Abdel Jalil ---- known for his 'piety,' according to the New York Times, Oct 29, 2011 ---- tell all that the main source of legislation in 'new' Libya would be the Shariah law! Gaddafi-era restrictions on polygamy would now be null and void! Adrian Salbuchi, the Argentinian author, analyst and founder of the Argentine Second Republic Movement, makes plain the pattern that the US-NATO powers have been following in the past decades. 'First they target a country by calling it a rogue state; then they support local terrorists and call them freedom fighters; then they bring death and destruction upon civilians and they call it UN sanctions. Then they spread lies and call it the International Community's opinions, expressed in the Western media. Then they invade and control the country and call it liberation and finally they steal appetising oil and call it foreign investment and reconstruction.' (Russia Today, October 21, 2011) Professor of International Relations, Bulent Gokay, editor, Global Faultlines writes on 27 October, that if there is any 'mad dog' (Reagan's reference to Gaddafi) in Libya, it is the US-NATO supported 'rebel force' who, against all civilised norms, 'brutally assaulted, tortured and murdered Gaddafi with two bullets to the head and one to the chest. After that they splayed his body on the hood of a car --- pulling his hair and banging his head before dragging his body into the street, kicking him like a football and displaying his corpse in a shopping centre meat locker.' Note what the Third Geneva Convention says: 'Prisoners of war must at all times be protected, particularly against acts of violence or intimidation and against insults and public curiosity.' They are entitled, in all circumstances, to humane treatment, to respect ---- for 'their persons, their honour, their family rights, their religious convictions and practices and their manners and customs.' The behaviour of the rebel forces was in perfect tune with the US-NATO leaders' obscene baying for Gaddafi's blood. Geneva Conventions can go to hell. One analyst points out that Hillary Clinton could be held liable for her statements in Tripoli. There are suggestions that a truce and surrender may have been worked out between some rebel leaders and Gaddafi's entourage, which was why his 40 vehicle convoy was heading west in broad daylight, with white flags flying atop some of the vehicles. And not only did the rebels not honour the truce-and-surrender deal, the demented mob had no holds barred, humiliating the former strongman in the most depraved manner. Tracey Shelton of Global Posts, says ---- on the basis of frame by frame analyses of Gaddafi's capture, recorded by a rebel fighter --- that the fallen man had even been sodomised with the knife-end of a machine gun! All these horrific images had gone global before NATO chain of command could block them.