Food adulteration in Bangladesh has evolved into one of the country's most alarming public health and governance crises-an issue that cuts across class lines but disproportionately punishes the poor. It is no longer just a question of hygiene or regulation; it has become a sociological symptom of deeper structural inequalities, economic desperation, and state incapacity.
Recent data from 2024-2025 paint a disturbing picture: the deliberate contamination of food with toxic chemicals is pervasive, and systemic across markets. From formalin in fish and fruits to textile dyes in turmeric and mustard oil, the nation's food supply chain has become an arena where profit is prioritised over human life. The problem of food adulteration is thus not only a public health hazard but also a mirror reflecting Bangladesh's political economy and moral fabric.
At its core, food adulteration refers to the deliberate addition, removal, or substitution of substances in food products that degrade quality or render them unsafe. The motivations behind this practice are profit-driven, arising from an unregulated market where unscrupulous actors exploit weak enforcement and public ignorance. Formalin-originally used to preserve biological specimens-is routinely applied to fish and fruits to prolong shelf life. Calcium carbide ripens mangoes and bananas prematurely, textile dyes give turmeric and chilli powder a brighter colour, and detergent or washing powder enhances the frothiness of milk.
Laboratory investigations have found adulterants such as urea, sulfuric acid, sodium cyclamate, and pesticides in basic foodstuffs. According to the 2024 study by the Institute of Public Health Bangladesh (IPHB), out of 43 common consumer goods tested, nearly 40 per cent contained adulterants, while 13 items were found to be completely compromised. These findings align with multiple reports estimating that over 70 per cent of food products circulating in urban and peri-urban markets are tainted, confirming that adulteration is not a marginal aberration but a pervasive structural feature of Bangladesh's food economy.
The health implications of this widespread contamination are catastrophic. The World Health Organisation (WHO) and the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) estimate that approximately 4.5 million Bangladeshis suffer from foodborne illnesses every year. The consumption of adulterated foods is associated with a wide range of acute and chronic health conditions, including gastrointestinal infections, liver and kidney failure, cardiovascular disorders, infertility, and various cancers. Hospitals across Dhaka, Chattogram, and Khulna are witnessing a rise in patients with liver cirrhosis, renal diseases, and neurological complications linked to prolonged chemical exposure.
A 2025 health bulletin from the Ministry of Health identified food adulteration as one of the major contributors to the rising incidence of cancer and chronic organ diseases in the country. Children face particular vulnerability: exposure to toxic substances affects their growth, immunity, and cognitive development, leaving intergenerational scars that manifest as malnutrition and reduced learning capacity.
In Dhaka city, studies conducted between 2023 and 2025 revealed that 40-54 per cent of daily-consumed foods-including staples like rice, vegetables, and milk-contained harmful chemical residues. These numbers translate into a silent epidemic of toxicity that compromises the nation's health and productivity.
The economic dimensions of this crisis are equally staggering. Estimates suggest that healthcare costs associated with adulteration-induced illnesses exceed 3 billion USD annually. This figure encompasses not only direct medical expenses but also productivity losses due to illness, long-term disability, and premature death. The poor bear the brunt of these costs through out-of-pocket payments, as over two-thirds of healthcare expenditure in Bangladesh remains privatised.
Food adulteration also weakens the country's export competitiveness. Repeated international rejections of Bangladeshi food shipments-especially fish, vegetables, and processed goods-due to contamination concerns have cost millions in potential export earnings. Beyond trade and health, adulteration erodes public trust in markets and institutions, generating a pervasive sense of insecurity that corrodes social cohesion.
At a sociological level, food adulteration epitomises structural inequality in Bangladesh's development model. For affluent classes, food safety can be partially secured through access to imported goods, branded supermarkets, and private testing services. For the poor, however, food safety is a luxury. In the informal markets where they shop, cheap prices come at the cost of safety.
Vendors catering to low-income neighbourhoods often rely on low-quality supply chains, lack refrigeration facilities, and engage in unsafe preservation techniques to remain competitive. Thus, poverty traps consumers within a toxic food system where they are both victims and, sometimes, participants-pressured by economic necessity to tolerate, or even engage in, adulteration to survive. This dynamic reveals that food adulteration is not merely a regulatory lapse but a manifestation of class-based vulnerability and moral hazard born of systemic inequality.
Regulatory weaknesses compound this injustice. Despite a suite of laws-including the Food Safety Act 2013, the Penal Code provisions, and the establishment of the Bangladesh Food Safety Authority (BFSA)-implementation remains grossly inadequate. The BFSA is underfunded and understaffed, with fewer than 500 inspectors tasked with monitoring millions of food outlets and vendors nationwide. Laboratory infrastructure is insufficient; only a handful of accredited labs possess the capacity to detect sophisticated adulterants such as heavy metals or synthetic dyes.
Enforcement is sporadic, driven by media-visible raids and mobile courts rather than sustained systemic monitoring. Corruption, political influence, and lack of coordination among government agencies further weaken institutional response. Even when fines are imposed or licences revoked, offenders often resume operations under new names, benefiting from weak record-keeping and political patronage.
Government efforts have not been absent. In recent years, mobile courts and special task forces have conducted thousands of raids, penalising producers and retailers caught selling adulterated goods. Public awareness campaigns, particularly around Ramadan when food adulteration peaks, have become more visible. Nevertheless, these interventions are reactive rather than preventive, addressing symptoms without tackling underlying causes.
The structure of Bangladesh's food economy-dominated by small-scale informal enterprises-poses unique regulatory challenges. Most small vendors operate without licenses or traceable supply chains, making it nearly impossible to enforce compliance. Moreover, the political economy of food adulteration involves entrenched networks of suppliers, wholesalers, and middlemen whose interests are tied to lax enforcement. These networks resist reforms that threaten profit margins, illustrating how governance failures are intertwined with class and power structures.
The culture of adulteration also reflects deeper socio-cultural pathologies. In a society where consumer awareness remains limited and civic activism over food rights is sporadic, moral accountability is often subordinated to economic pragmatism. Adulteration thrives in a context of weak collective morality, where both producers and consumers operate under a logic of survival.
For many small traders, the choice is stark: adulterate or perish in an unforgiving market. This moral economy of necessity sustains practices that endanger millions, revealing the ethical dimension of inequality-how systemic deprivation corrodes social responsibility and normalises harm.
Children and women suffer disproportionate impacts within this context. Malnourished children consuming chemically treated food experience compounded nutritional deficits that hinder growth and learning. Women, often primary caregivers and food preparers, face the dual burden of managing household nutrition and mitigating health risks.
The anxiety of ensuring food safety under conditions of uncertainty adds to their mental and emotional strain. In many low-income families, mothers must make impossible choices-between affordability and safety, between hunger and risk-decisions that illustrate the intersection of gender, poverty, and health vulnerability.
Policy interventions must, therefore, go beyond punitive enforcement. A sustainable solution requires strengthening regulatory infrastructure, enhancing transparency, and addressing the structural conditions that sustain adulteration. The Bangladesh Food Safety Authority needs increased budgetary allocations, trained human resources, and decentralised authority to coordinate with local governments.
Building laboratory capacity across all divisions is critical to ensuring real-time testing and surveillance. Digital traceability systems-such as QR-coded certification for food batches-can enhance consumer confidence and deter malpractice. Technological innovation, including the distribution of affordable rapid-testing kits at community levels, can democratize detection and empower consumers.
Equally vital is the cultivation of public awareness and civic participation. Schools, universities, and community organisations should integrate food safety education into curricula and outreach programs. Civil society movements, supported by media and NGOs, can amplify consumer rights and pressure policymakers for accountability. Strengthening the social contract between citizens and state institutions is central to transforming food safety from a regulatory issue into a collective moral commitment.
International collaboration can further bolster domestic capacity. Partnerships with FAO, WHO, and regional laboratories can facilitate technology transfer and strengthen early warning systems for chemical contamination. Integrating food safety with broader social protection schemes-such as subsidised nutritious food programs for the poor-can mitigate class disparities in access to safe nutrition. Moreover, a progressive taxation system that funds public health interventions targeting food safety could reorient national priorities toward equitable health outcomes.
Ultimately, combating food adulteration requires a paradigm shift in governance and public ethics. Safe food must be recognised not merely as a commodity but as a fundamental human right linked to dignity, equity, and sustainable development. The persistence of adulteration undermines not only health but also social justice and trust in public institutions. It perpetuates a culture where inequality becomes biologically embedded, as the poor ingest more toxins and bear the long-term consequences of structural neglect.
The statistics from 2024-2025 reaffirm that food safety cannot be separated from issues of poverty, governance, and ethics. Unless comprehensive, cross-sectoral reforms are undertaken-combining strong institutions, public participation, technological innovation, and social justice-the plates of millions will remain tainted, and their lives, unequally imperiled. Safe food is more than a policy goal; it is the measure of a society's moral and political maturity.
Dr Matiur Rahman is a researcher and development professional.
matiurrahman588@gmail.com
© 2025 - All Rights with The Financial Express
