KATHMANDU, July 22 (AFP): Nepal's Maoists said Tuesday they would not form the Himalayan nation's first post-royal government after the defeat of their candidate for president, setting off a new political crisis here.
The former rebels' decision, seen as a blow to Nepal's peace process, came one day after rival parties in a constitutional assembly ganged up against the Maoists to elect a president allied to the main centrist party.
"The party's central committee... decided not to form the government under our leadership," Maoist spokesman Krishna Bahadur Mahara told AFP.
Elections to the assembly in April gave the Maoists the largest single bloc of seats, but not an outright majority. The Maoists had insisted their choice of president should be elected and that they form a new government.
But a vote Monday saw Ram Baran Yadav from the Nepali Congress party -- the Maoists' main rival -- anointed the country's first president.
"After the presidential election, it is certain that we do not have a majority. So we do not have any basis to form the next government," said Mahara.
The presidency is a largely ceremonial position, but the Maoists have argued that Yadav's victory would give them little room to manoeuvre should they form a government, and little chance of implementing key platform pledges like radical land reform.
The Maoist spokesman however added that the "door to talks with other parties is still open."
The Maoists' continued involvement in mainstream politics is seen as crucial to the survival of Nepal's peace process, which ended a decade-long rebel uprising that killed at least 13,000 people dead.
It was not immediately clear if the other parties could cobble together their own alliance and pull Nepal out of the political vacuum that followed the abolition of the 240-year-old monarchy on May 28.
"The Maoists' decision to stay in opposition is a setback for the peace process. There will be complications if the Maoists stick to their decision," explained Gunaraj Luitel, editor of Nepal's Kantipur daily newspaper.
He said the latest crisis stemmed from the fact that the rival parties to the peace deal, which was signed in 2006, had failed to adapt to the compromises involved in multi-party politics.
"There is no clear majority for any party, but being the biggest party, the Maoists have the right to form the government. But they also have to gain the confidence of other parties," the editor said.
Lok Raj Baral, political science professor at Nepal's Tribhuvan University, said the other parties "have to bring the Maoists into the government at any cost in order to keep the peace process on track."
