A rare requiem

India paying tribute to Zia seen as paradigm shift

Statement recalls his 'famous radio address of March 1971, which electrified masses, inspired them on a path of resistance'


MIR MOSTAFIZUR RAHAMAN | Published: June 01, 2026 00:07:07


India paying tribute to Zia seen as paradigm shift


A rare and carefully worded tribute by India to slain President Ziaur Rahman on his death anniversary has stirred discussions in diplomatic and political circles, with many observers describing it as a significant departure from New Delhi's longstanding approach towards Bangladesh's contested political narratives.
In a message released Saturday, India's Ministry of External Affairs paid homage to Ziaur Rahman, Bir Uttam, recalling his contribution to Bangladesh's Liberation War and reaffirming India's solidarity with the people of Bangladesh.
"As the people of Bangladesh gather today in memory of one of their nation's bravest sons - Shaheed President Zia-ur-Rahman, Bir Uttam - we recall his famous radio address of March 1971, which electrified the masses, inspired them on a path of resistance against oppression and led to national liberation," the commemorative statement reads.
Adds the ministry: "Today, as then, India stands shoulder to shoulder with the people of Bangladesh in a saga of shared sacrifices and a common journey towards progress and prosperity of both our peoples."
The remarks have attracted attention because successive Indian governments had traditionally aligned themselves with the historical narrative promoted by the Awami League, which has often downplayed Ziaur Rahman's role in the liberation struggle. By explicitly recognising his wartime contribution, analysts say New Delhi may be signalling a broader recalibration of its Bangladesh policy following the political changes in Dhaka.
Talking to The Financial Express, ambassador Munshi Faiz Ahmed has described the Indian statement as a positive and significant development.
"Recognising Zia's announcement by the Indian government is a very important step from the Indian side," he says in an implicit reference to the proclaimer-of-independence conundrum.
According to him, the timing of the statement is particularly noteworthy given that Tarique Rahman now leads the government in Bangladesh.
"It is a move taken at a time when Zia's son, Tarique Rahman, is the prime minister of Bangladesh, and this is a very positive step," he says.
Munshi argues that Bangladesh should respond positively to the gesture through visible diplomatic initiatives aimed at rebuilding trust and strengthening bilateral ties.
"Prime minister-level engagement is essential to take forward this relationship. Foreign minister-level meetings are not enough. A summit meeting can create momentum and consolidate a forward-looking approach," he suggests.
Addressing speculation that Tarique Rahman's first foreign visit as prime minister could influence bilateral relations, he dismisses concerns that a visit to China before India would necessarily damage ties.
"His first visit depends on convenience and the invitation of the host country. It should not be interpreted as a signal against India," the diplomat notes.
Parvez Karim Abbasi, executive director of the Centre for Governance Studies, views the Indian statement as evidence of a broader strategic reassessment in New Delhi.
"The recent statement by the Indian High Commission in Dhaka reflecting on the historic radio address by late President Ziaur Rahman points to a profound shift in relations between Dhaka and New Delhi," he says.
Talking to the FE, Abbasi, who is also teaching at the East West University, said by openly acknowledging Ziaur Rahman's role in the liberation war, India appears willing to engage more constructively with Bangladesh's current political leadership while moving beyond what many critics saw as an exclusive reliance on the Awami League.
"The statement underscores a shared history between India and the freedom fighters of Bangladesh and departs from the previous tendency to endorse a singular political narrative surrounding 1971," he observes.
Abbasi argues that Indian policymakers may have concluded that dependence on a single political force to manage relations with Bangladesh was ultimately unsustainable.
"There is a growing realisation in New Delhi that it may have erred in relying too heavily on one party to secure such an important bilateral relationship."
He suggests that India is now seeking to engage a broader spectrum of political actors in Bangladesh while pursuing a diplomatic reset in the post-Awami League era.
The shift, he thinks, is also driven by wider geopolitical considerations.
Analysts believe New Delhi is eager to preserve stable and productive relations with its eastern neighbour on issues ranging from trade and investment to connectivity, climate cooperation and security.
What is clear, however, is that New Delhi's public recognition of Ziaur Rahman's contribution to Bangladesh's liberation struggle has reopened debate about the future direction of one of South Asia's most important bilateral relationships and raised expectations of a new chapter in ties between the two next-door neighbours.

mirmostafiz@yahoo.com

Share if you like