Banking sector reforms to restore confidence, stability

---

FE Team | Published: Thursday, 29 January 2026

---

The banking sector of Bangladesh has been under intense strain after years of weak governance, political interference, and regulatory failure. Doctored financial statements and large-scale loan defaults have eroded public confidence and threatened overall economic stability. The central bank, under the present interim administration, has, however, initiated a series of reforms aimed at stabilising the system and protecting depositors with the sector stakeholders feeling the necessity of greater and sustained reforms. Against such a backdrop, The Financial Express organised a roundtable discussion titled "Banking Sector Reforms" to facilitate informed dialogue on the need for reforms. Finance Adviser Dr Salehuddin Ahmed graced the event as the chief guest and Bangladesh Bank Governor Dr Ahsan H Mansur as the special guest. The Financial Express Editor and CEO Shamsul Huq Zahid chaired the event where BIBM Professor Dr Shah Md. Ahsan Habib presented the keynote paper. FE's Head of Online & Multimedia Shiabur Rahman (Shihab) moderated the discussion.

Dr Salehuddin Ahmed
Adviser, Ministry of Finance

The interim government is making a final push to advance long-delayed reforms in the banking sector, particularly through amendments to the Bank Company Act and the Bangladesh Bank Order, with the goal of strengthening the autonomy of the central bank. With only several days left in office, completing both reforms within such a short timeframe is extremely challenging. Still, the intention is clear, and the direction of reform has already been set. Banking remains a difficult and fragile area, but there are signs of gradual improvement. The idea that nothing has changed does not reflect reality. The problems accumulated over nearly 15 years, and such deep-rooted issues cannot be resolved overnight. Many institutions have suffered from weak governance, inefficient management, flawed laws, and serious financial irregularities. Quick fixes are unrealistic, but efforts are underway to bring the system back onto a sound footing. Despite internal challenges, Bangladesh's external image remains relatively positive, and the economy is still manageable. On the legal front, the Negotiable Instrument Act has just been passed and we are trying to amend Money Laundering Prevention Act and Artha Rin Adalat Ain (Money Loan Court Act). These measures are intended to strengthen oversight and close long-standing loopholes. Implementation will take time, but work is continuing at full pace, even on weekends, to make progress within the limited window available. Looking back, the banking sector faced a major crisis in 2007-08. It was caused by non-compliance with prudential norms, misuse of discretion, and weak governance, particularly in cases where owners dominated management. Experience shows that strong institutions and competent management can still make a meaningful difference, even within existing constraints.

Dr Ahsan H. Mansur
Governor, Bangladesh Bank

We decided that we will not constitute any commission; rather we will implement reforms through direct task force. And we have already formed three separate task forces on banking sector reform, Bangladesh Bank reform, and asset recovery. We started reform tasks directly through formation of the task forces because we understood that commissions would take a long time, and the economy cannot wait. The proposal for amendments to Bangladesh Bank Order is an outcome of the Bangladesh Bank Reform Task Force. We have seen that many industries were affected over the years for political and economic reasons, and due to crises like COVID-19 and the Ukraine-Russia war. Some factories were at risk of closing, and we decided to keep them running irrespective of the political affiliation of the owners. We believe politics should not destroy business. This is the biggest difference the current administration has with the 1/11 regime. Had we run the financial sector with 'mob culture' mind set after the political changeover, half of the economy would have been destroyed. Given circumstances, we tried our best to save the industry and economy. We have taken an approach, forming Joint Investigation Teams (JITs), comprising representatives from relevant agencies, to address financial crimes. What the next government should ultimately do is forming National Crime Agency like in the UK. Crimes will keep happening in the financial sector and we have to have a mechanism to contain them and go after the culprits. We have to maintain the nature of the joint investigation task force. We have managed to have two important laws passed - on deposit insurance and bank resolution, which we are actively applying, including for NBFIs. Now we are trying to have passed the amendments to the Money Loan Court law without which it will be difficult to recover money. The Bank Company (Amendment) Act is critical, and we need to ensure it is passed to strengthen banking governance. We have worked to reduce regulatory overreach, giving more operational power to banks while maintaining necessary oversight.

Mahbubur Rahman
President, International Chamber of Commerce Bangladesh

The banking sector is the cornerstone of our economy, mobilising savings, financing trade, and enabling entrepreneurship. Yet, we face serious problems that threaten growth and stability. Non-performing loans are a pressing issue. NPLs have risen from 20.2% in 2024 to 35.7% in 2025, causing hardship across the sector. Wilful defaulters must be treated firmly and consistently, while legitimate businesses under temporary stress should receive structural support to recover. Without full credit discipline, reform cannot succeed. Independent directors alone cannot ensure accountability because they lack stake; stakeholders must remain involved and controlled. Transparency and accountability are essential to restore investor confidence and prevent fiscal and macro-financial risks. Central bank autonomy is critical; technically it has operated independently, but formally it requires legal recognition. I urge the Finance Advisor to make certain amendments to ensure formal autonomy for Bangladesh Bank. Liquidity assistance has stabilised weak banks temporarily, but spoon-feeding cannot replace sound governance. Extraordinary support cannot become a business model; bankruptcy must take its natural course.

Shamsul Haq Zahid
Editor & CEO, The Financial Express

The banking sector, in a dire state, needs massive reforms. For years, some banks doctored their financials, hiding the true picture. Political interference in loan sanctioning, frequent amendments favouring certain groups, and regulatory indulgence allowed looters to prey on depositors' money. Since the collapse of the autocratic regime, the central bank, with the Ministry of Finance, has worked hard to protect depositors, merging five Islami banks into one. These steps have restored some confidence, but non-performing loans remain huge - nearly a third of total loans. The central bank initially took a tough stance on defaulters but later softened to save jobs in large manufacturing units linked to cronies. The issue of Bangladesh Bank's autonomy is critical. Legislation alone won't ensure independence; the culture of political interference must end, though guaranteeing non-interference in Bangladesh is challenging.

Dr Shah Md Ahsan Habib
Professor, Bangladesh Institute of Bank Management (BIBM)

Since August 2024, we faced unprecedented turmoil - double-digit inflation, falling forex reserves, and distressed loans exceeding thirty percent. Political interference, corruption, and weak regulation left many banks insolvent and short of liquidity. Emergency measures, tightened monetary policy, exchange rate flexibility, and reduced public spending helped stabilise the situation and restore trust in banks. We changed boards of weak banks, strengthened oversight, uncovered hidden losses, and formed a task force to review banks' true financial condition. Mega mergers and the Bank Resolution Ordinance 2025 gave the central bank legal power to control failing banks and protect depositors. Deposit Protection Ordinance 2025 doubled coverage and reduced payout times, including non-banks. Central bank autonomy is essential. Independence, accountability, skilled staff, transparency, and strong institutions are needed to stabilise prices, build trust, and prevent political interference. Reforms must continue under strong political commitment, with a comprehensive financial roadmap covering banks, non-banks, and capital markets, ensuring credit growth, digital banking, consumer protection, and preparation for the post-LDC transition phase.

A K Azad
Chairman, Shahjalal Islami Bank PLC

We have been hearing about the proposed Banking Commission and reforms for a long time. We need reforms not just for government banks, where 50% of loans are classified, but also for many private banks. Many private banks need mergers. The boards of private banks remain unchanged for decades. Why should someone serve more than three years, with their family or associates taking over after them? We need a system to prevent lifetime board positions. Much has been achieved in the past one and a half years. Many bold steps have been taken that could have taken five years otherwise. Still, some defaulters have received repeated opportunities, which creates unfair competition. I urge a review of these policies before the current leadership leaves.

Taskeen Ahmed
President, Dhaka Chamber of Commerce & Industry (DCCI )

Currency stability is extremely important, especially when we talk about future responsibility for managing the dollar. When we hear that non-performing loans have reached 35 or 36 percent, it creates the impression that all borrowers have looted the banks. But that is not the reality. From what we understand through chamber-level assessments, less than two percent of borrowers are responsible for almost forty per cent of total NPLs. This is a very painful reality for all of us. While we talk about banking reforms, we also need to ask an uncomfortable question. Is all the responsibility only with private borrowers and commercial banks, or does accountability also lie with the regulator? If laws were properly enforced and accountability was applied consistently, the situation would not have reached this stage.

Mohammad Hatem
President, BKMEA

The business situation is worsening. Many factories have shut down - 278 so far - and more are at risk. In export, buyers take goods on deferred payments of 120-180 days but often delay payment. When payment is delayed, banks immediately stop back-to-back LCs and other facilities, making it impossible to ship goods on time. What will happen to the businesses which are being affected by non-cooperation of banks? Let me highlight Section 18B of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, which deals with registration of buying houses. That registration provision has stopped and now buying houses are accountable to none. The current system forces exporters to rely on intermediaries who delay payments, which is unfair and risky.

Syed Abu Naser Bukhtear Ahmed
Chairman, Agrani Bank PLC

The banking sector faces challenges from political pressure, weak corporate governance, and regulatory lapses. Politicians often influence board members, who in turn pressurise management to approve loans in connivance with clients, sometimes even to fictitious accounts. Regulatory representatives have not always been able to supervise effectively, contributing to growing non-performing loans. Over the past 15 years, classified loans have increased significantly, and accountability remains unclear. Responsibility lies not with all customers but with board members and management who allowed such lapses, sometimes under political influence. Many assets remain unrecovered, and funds have left the country, creating additional stress for banks.

Dr Arifur Rahman
Chairman, Premier Bank PLC

We often ask whether the thief or the lock came first. We all know first came the thief. We should give thanks to the "thieves" who taught us how to make better locks. While we criticise those who stole from our banks and fled, we should acknowledge that they have taught us how to protect our systems. I want to give a standing ovation to our Governor, Ahsan H. Mansur, who has effectively "locked everyone," ensuring our banking system is much safer.
However, as a banker, I feel that providing relief loans to borrowers has affected banks' income. A possible solution is for the central bank to allow commercial banks to have deposits at lower rates, similar to government banks, which would benefit all.

Sharif Zahir
Chairman, United Commercial Bank PLC

The country's economy was saved post-August 5, preventing a collapse of the banking sector. Boards have been reconstructed, transparency improved, and forensic audits conducted. The main challenge now is the capital adequacy ratio, which is extremely low at around three percent. Addressing actual non-performing loans (NPLs) becomes difficult because recognising them openly impacts the balance sheet and restricts credit lines, affecting trade and the economy. A major issue is dealing with looters and international criminals. Banks cannot address these NPLs without separating criminal assets from regular business operations. Anti-corruption institutions remain untrained to international standards, and practical support from organisations like the FBI or NCAs was not fully utilised.

Md Ali Hossain Prodhania
Chairman, NRBC Bank PLC

In the late eighties, classified loans went beyond 50 per cent, but today the percentage looks lower. The reality, however, is different. Earlier, loans were classified mainly due to business failure, but now looted and stolen money has entered the loan system. If we do not clearly separate genuine classified loans from outright theft, the burden of these loans will remain on the banking sector indefinitely unless they are written off. When loans are diverted, misused, or stolen, they should not be treated as normal defaults. Theft is a different matter and needs a different legal and recovery approach. Through forensic audits, we often see that a significant amount of money is still traceable within the banking system.

Helal Ahmed Chowdhury
Chairman, BASIC Bank PLC

I wish to talk about how banks can be reorganised and rationalised. First, all branches must be mapped. Where there are too many branches, we can reduce them and relocate resources to rural areas. This will control expansion and improve oversight. Loss making branches should be recovered through special monitoring. Bank reconstruction should follow three stages -- immediate, medium-term, and long-term. The transformation of Pubali Bank shows us the importance of long-term planning. Many properties are still tied up in court, which creates financial strain for banks, including my own. We cannot progress if there is no holistic approach. Retail debts are substantial - Basic Bank alone has 2,500 crore in retail debt and many other banks face similar unresolved exposures.

Syed Mahbubur Rahman
Managing Director, Mutual Trust Bank PLC

The key issue we face in the banking sector is shattered trust. Political resistance is widespread, and powerful borrowers with political connections often push back against accountability. Regulatory weaknesses are evident, with limited supervisory capacity, especially in risk-based supervision, stress testing, and early-warning systems. Legal and judicial bottlenecks delay loan recovery for years, which encourages a culture of tolerance for default. Weak corporate governance allows directors to prioritise personal and political agendas over fiduciary duty. State-owned banks remain fragile, chronically undercapitalised, and vulnerable to political misuse. To address these problems, regulatory independence must be enforced through updated banking company orders and amendments to the Banking Companies Act.

Mohammad Naser Ezaz Bijoy
CEO, Standard Chartered Bank Bangladesh

There are three major stakeholders in banking sector reform -- banks, clients, and regulators. Management should have primary responsibility for decision-making to ensure accountability. Independence of regulators is critical, as Bangladesh Bank's success since August 5, 2024 shows. Bulk of the success of the interim government has come from what the central bank did in the last 18 months. However, excessive power without accountability could lead to misuse, so mechanisms must ensure banks and clients are not abused. Client awareness must improve, especially in risk pricing, which was long absent. Non-performing loans will always exist, but the current 35% level is unacceptable and includes wilful defaulters.

Mohammad Ali
Managing Director, Pubali Bank PLC

I want to start by talking about political affiliation. When the board changed due to state sponsorship, boards were reformed overnight, and foreign investors were forced to leave banks. This created an asset bubble, which was a major reason for instability. If this had not happened, classification issues would have been minor. At that time, independent directors, including myself, observed the situation and how Bangladesh Bank gained autonomy. The banking sector must be free from political hostility so that strategic partners, especially foreign investors, remain unaffected. Another key issue is bank governance. Loan sanction should not be approved by the executive committee; it should be vested on the management.

Alamgir Hossain
Managing Director, Citizens Bank PLC

We have seen many reform initiatives in the last one and a half years, including IFRS 9 implementation, identification of wilful defaulters, and the Ultimate Beneficial Owner framework. These were landmark decisions, but challenges remain. The loan approval process is still fully with the board, which is unusual internationally. Large loan approval should remain with the board, but smaller loans should be delegated to management, gradually shifting the entire approval process. The legal system is slow and cumbersome, which contributes to rising loan defaults. I request the Finance Advisor and Governor to consider legal reforms to speed up recovery and reduce default culture. Independent directors need proper evaluation.

Sohail R K Hussain
Managing Director, Bank Asia PLC

What has really driven the current banking sector reforms is a complete failure of governance and the breakdown of checks and balances over the last ten years. Reforms are always necessary, but this is not a routine situation. We need to ask whether the solutions being proposed are truly adequate and whether they match international best practices. Bangladesh is not the first country to face this kind of crisis, so there are lessons to learn. The caps and restrictions proposed by the central bank have strong justification, but by themselves they are not enough. In banking, boards, management, auditors, rating agencies, and regulators have their roles in ensuring a check and balance. What happened in the last decade shows that this entire chain was weakened by political influence and lack of will.

Rizwan Dawood Shams
Managing Director, IPDC Finance PLC

Non-banking financial institutions work with the same customers as banks do. But NBFIs face some challenges because policies differ for banks and NBFIs. When rescheduling genuine client cases, NBFIs are to handle income release differently from banks, reducing motivation for them to help clients. Short-term facilities are also handled differently, with stricter classification rules for NBFIs. A major issue is that NBFIs cannot enjoy deferred tax benefit on provisional expenses, unlike banks, which creates extra financial burden. For wilful defaulters, cost-plus-premium rules make recovery difficult, whereas banks have more flexible approaches. Write-off rules are stricter for NBFIs, requiring long waiting periods, unlike banks, which can write off sooner under circulars like the 10-year and 2-year BRPT 7.

M Khurshed Alam
Additional Managing Director, NCC Bank PLC

I want to highlight key legal issues for banking sector reforms. I suggest that if any writ petition is filed against a bank's suit or execution case, no stay order should be allowed without hearing the bank. Any challenge to a bank's order should require depositing 20% of the suit value with the bank or Bangladesh Bank. Special training should be arranged by Bangladesh Bank and the Judicial Service Commission for presiding judges of these cases. I propose forming five special benches in the High Court Division to handle Arthorin cases efficiently. Banks should have the power to impose travel restrictions on defaulting borrowers and to publish the names and addresses of defaulters and guarantors in newspapers.

Doulot Akter Mala
President, Economic Reporters' Forum (ERF)

As newsmen, we see the economy from the perspectives of both the government and private sector. We feared a collapse when the banking situation became critical, but thanks to the Governor and Honourable Advisor, a bank run did not happen. In the previous government, we were concerned about whether import bills could be paid due to declining reserves. Now the reserves are relatively strong, which gives us some comfort. However, when money leaves the economy through tax evasion or loan defaults, it reduces taxpayers' ability and willingness to pay taxes, which must be addressed. The ACC and other investigative bodies are not fully equipped; investigations have been slow, and reforms have lacked visible outcomes.