Bangladesh's digital economy has grown substantially over the past decade. Wider internet access, smartphone adoption, a young population, and government investment have pulled financial services, healthcare, education, and trade onto digital platforms. Mobile internet has made large-scale public service delivery, utility payments, tax submissions, and online applications at a speed and reach that weren't imaginable fifteen years ago. The fintech ecosystem, alongside e-commerce and a new generation of tech startups, has matured into a meaningful economic layer.
But the growth has been uneven. Structural gaps, institutional fragmentation, and weak human capital remain real constraints. And with AI integration now on the policy agenda, alongside a universal payment gateway that would link banks, mobile financial services, and government platforms in real time, Bangladesh can't afford to paper over these gaps with aspiration. What's needed is a clear transformation roadmap built around three pillars: public-private collaboration on digital public infrastructure (DPI); binding legislation for interoperability, cybersecurity, and data protection; and regulatory convergence to match the realities of a digitally integrated economy.
Public-Private Partnership for DPI
A December 2025 ADB report on digital public infrastructure in South Asia found that Bangladesh's government platforms are largely built in silos, lacking interoperability, leading to duplication, inefficiency, and a fragmented user experience. The country's data exchange infrastructure is nascent and lacks the protocols needed for secure system-wide integration. This isn't a technical problem at its core. It's a structural one.
The private sector has driven most of Bangladesh's digital adoption in fintech, e-commerce, and connectivity, but remains excluded from DPI co-creation. That exclusion is costly. Private partners bring technical depth, investment capacity, and incentives to build systems that actually work at scale, not just at launch. PPP arrangements can strengthen project assessments, introduce whole-life maintenance thinking, and establish the monitoring mechanisms needed for continuous service improvement. Without private sector involvement, public DPI tends to be built once and left to degrade.
Sri Lanka offers a useful reference point. Facing economic collapse and political upheaval simultaneously, the country adopted a National Digital Economy Strategy 2030 and appointed Dr. Hans Wijayasuriya, former CEO of Axiata Group's telecommunications business, as Chief Advisor to the President on Digital Economy in 2025. Bringing a thirty-year private sector career into a public leadership role was a deliberate choice: the country needed someone who understood how digital infrastructure actually gets built and sustained, not just how it gets announced. Bangladesh is in a different position, but the logic transfers.
Legal Measures for DPI Governance, Cybersecurity, and Data Protection
Interoperability without a legal mandate is voluntary, which means it won't happen consistently. Bangladesh needs binding legislation that requires cross-sector data flows, defines liability clearly, and establishes enforceable compliance standards. A fully integrated DPI also changes what's possible with AI: predictive demand modelling, automated public services, and real-time transactions across financial and government platforms all depend on trusted, structured data pipelines. Weak governance undermines that potential before it's realised.
The Cyber Security Ordinance 2025 addresses hacking, AI-driven fraud, and online harassment. The Bangladesh Data Protection Ordinance 2025 outlines a framework for regulating personal data. Both are steps forward. Neither is sufficient on its own. Fragmented governance, poor inter-agency coordination, and low cybercrime literacy among law enforcement undermine enforcement of the security framework. The data protection ordinance, meanwhile, faces questions about alignment with international human rights standards, specifically around privacy, freedom of expression, and access to information, which need to sit at the core of any democratic data governance framework, not at its edges.
Laws without enforcement capacity don't transform systems. They produce compliance theatre. Bangladesh needs sustained investment in cybersecurity skills, a centralized computer incident response capability, and genuine institutional clarity about which agency owns which mandate before the legislation can do the work it's designed to do.
Convergence to a Primary Governance Structure
Digital convergence has dissolved the boundaries between sectors that regulation once treated as separate. Telecommunications, financial services, media, and energy infrastructure now operate on shared IP-based platforms. The regulatory architecture hasn't kept up. In Bangladesh, mobile financial services run on telecom networks regulated by BTRC, while Bangladesh Bank oversees the financial side, and the ICT division manages digital security. Broadcasting falls under the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting; the spectrum is under BTRC. Smart meters operate through digital infrastructure regulated separately from the energy pricing that BERC controls. Every overlapping jurisdiction is a friction point, a place where coordination fails, decisions slow, and innovation stops waiting and goes elsewhere.
Other countries have moved. Nigeria restructured its communications ministry into the Federal Ministry of Communications, Innovation, and Digital Economy, with NITDA as the primary digital economy regulator. Malaysia established a dedicated Ministry of Digital in 2023. Sri Lanka created a Ministry of Digital Economy in November 2024 specifically to house its Digital Economy Strategy 2030. Each of these was a deliberate structural decision, not a rebranding exercise, but a consolidation of overlapping mandates into a coherent governance body.
Bangladesh needs the same. A unified ministry consolidating digital infrastructure, technology policy, and regulation built by merging the overlapping portfolios, divisions, and implementing agencies that currently operate in parallel would reduce duplication, cut bureaucratic drag, and give the country a single accountable institution for its digital agenda. That institution doesn't exist yet. Until it does, the coordination failures will persist regardless of how good the individual policies are.
T.I.M. Nurul Kabir, Business, Technology, and Policy Analyst
timnkabir@gmail.com
© 2026 - All Rights with The Financial Express
