Inflation has become one of the most significant economic issues confronting Bangladesh in recent years. Rising costs of food, fuel, and essential goods have diminished household purchasing power, strained public finances, and made it more difficult to maintain economic growth. In response, policymakers have primarily depended on two main categories of tools: monetary policy, led by the central bank, and fiscal policy, supervised by the government. Although these policies are vital for stabilizing the economy, their effectiveness is not boundless. Grasping both their capabilities and limitations is crucial as Bangladesh aims to transition from an inflationary climate to one of inclusive and sustainable growth.
To grasp the present challenge, it's essential to see the economy as a vehicle. Monetary policy functions like the brake and steering wheel, regulating the speed (money supply and interest rates) to prevent overheating (inflation). On the other hand, fiscal policy serves as the fuel, dictating the government's expenditure on infrastructure, education, and social safety nets, as well as how it gathers the revenue to finance these initiatives.
As reported by the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS), the GDP growth rate rose to 4.5 per cent in the first quarter of FY26, fueled by growth in both the industrial and agricultural sectors. The increase in industrial activity has been particularly significant in enhancing overall output, indicating that the economy is recovering from previous sluggishness.
However, despite this positive trend, the World Bank has revised its growth forecast for Bangladesh downward for FY26. In its most recent Global Economic Prospects report, the Bank has reduced its projection by 0.3 percentage points from the estimate made in June, now anticipating an economic expansion of approximately 4.6 per cent for this fiscal year. This adjustment accounts for ongoing difficulties, including persistent inflation, lackluster export performance, and weak investment demand.
When inflation increases, the typical monetary response is to tighten policies. Higher interest rates lead to more expensive borrowing, which in turn slows down both consumption and investment. A decrease in credit growth helps to alleviate demand pressures and stabilize prices. Additionally, strict monetary conditions can bolster the exchange rate by deterring capital outflows and lowering import demand, which ultimately aids in controlling imported inflation.
In theory, monetary policy is ideally positioned to manage inflation as it directly affects aggregate demand. However, in practice, its effectiveness in Bangladesh encounters several challenges. Firstly, the transmission mechanism is somewhat weak. Adjustments in policy rates do not always seamlessly convert into lending and deposit rates due to structural problems within the banking sector, such as high levels of non-performing loans and regulatory controls on interest rates.
Secondly, a considerable amount of inflation in Bangladesh is influenced by supply-side factors, including food shortages, logistical challenges, and global price fluctuations. Monetary tightening has a limited effect on these inflation sources. Increasing interest rates cannot boost agricultural production, enhance port efficiency, or reduce international oil prices. Consequently, aggressive monetary tightening may hinder growth without adequately addressing the fundamental causes of inflation.
Lastly, excessive tightening can negatively impact investment and employment. Bangladesh's development strategy heavily depends on private investment, export-driven manufacturing, and small to medium enterprises. Sustained high interest rates may deter entrepreneurs, diminish job creation, and weaken growth momentum, especially during a time of global economic uncertainty.
Fiscal policy encompasses the government's choices regarding taxation, public expenditure, and borrowing. In contrast to monetary policy, which mainly affects demand, fiscal policy can tackle issues on both the demand and supply sides. When it comes to inflation, maintaining fiscal discipline is crucial. Significant budget deficits that are financed by borrowing from the banking sector can lead to an increase in the money supply, thereby intensifying inflationary pressures.
To help control inflation, the government can streamline expenditure, enhance revenue collection, and focus on spending that boosts productivity. For instance, cutting back on inefficient subsidies and more effectively targeting social protection programs can alleviate fiscal strain while safeguarding vulnerable populations. On the revenue front, expanding the tax base and improving compliance can lessen the dependence on deficit financing.
Moreover, fiscal policy is vital for fostering growth. Public investments in infrastructure, education, healthcare, and digital connectivity create a solid foundation for long-term economic development. In Bangladesh, investments in transportation systems, energy production, and human capital have historically facilitated industrialization and export growth.
Fiscal policy can also be employed in a counter-cyclical manner. During times of economic downturn, increased public spending or specific tax relief can boost demand and aid recovery. However, this strategy must be executed with caution in an inflationary context. Expansionary fiscal policies that do not correspond with productivity improvements may worsen inflation instead of encouraging sustainable growth.
One of the key takeaways from economic experience is that monetary and fiscal policies cannot function effectively on their own. A lack of coordination between the two can jeopardize macroeconomic stability. For instance, if the central bank tightens monetary policy to curb inflation while the government implements an expansionary fiscal policy funded by borrowing, this could lead to increased interest rates without significant deflation.
In Bangladesh, the need for effective policy coordination is especially crucial due to structural limitations and external vulnerabilities. A strong commitment to fiscal discipline can improve the effectiveness of monetary policy by stabilizing inflation expectations. On the other hand, a stable monetary environment with predictable inflation aids fiscal planning and lowers the costs associated with government borrowing.
Effective policy coordination also hinges on clear communication. When households and businesses grasp the policy direction and have confidence in the authorities' commitment to stability, their expectations adjust accordingly. Well-anchored expectations lessen the necessity for drastic policy measures and facilitate a smoother transition from controlling inflation to accelerating growth.
Although monetary and fiscal policies are significant instruments, they cannot replace the need for structural reforms. A lot of the inflationary pressures in Bangladesh stems from entrenched supply-side limitations. Tackling these challenges is crucial for achieving lasting price stability and ongoing growth.
Agriculture is still a vital sector. Enhancing storage facilities, transportation, access to finance, and technology can help minimize post-harvest losses and stabilize food prices. By diversifying energy sources and investing in renewable energy, we can lessen the impact of global fuel price fluctuations. Improving logistics, ports, and customs processes can reduce import expenses and boost export competitiveness.
The financial sector also needs reform. Lowering non-performing loans, enhancing governance in banks, and reinforcing regulatory oversight would improve credit distribution and the effectiveness of monetary policy. A more robust financial system can facilitate investment without causing excessive inflation.
Bangladesh is intricately woven into the global economy via trade, remittances, and financial transactions. As a result, external influences impose constraints on domestic policy decisions. A tightening of monetary policy in developed nations can result in capital flight and pressure on exchange rates, making it more challenging to manage inflation domestically. Likewise, global economic downturns can diminish export demand, constraining growth opportunities despite domestic stimulus efforts.
Neither monetary nor fiscal policy can repair a "leaky" pipe. The high levels of Non-Performing Loans (NPLs) in the banking sector create a bottleneck. If the banking system is burdened with bad debt, even a future reduction in interest rates won't stimulate productive investment, as banks will remain too vulnerable to extend loans. The power of policy is in its credibility. As long as the public trusts that the Taka in their pocket is being protected and the taxes they pay are being invested in the future, the transition from inflation to growth is not just possible, it is inevitable.
The journey from inflation to growth is not merely a technical adjustment; it is a test of our national resilience. Monetary policy can provide stability, and fiscal policy can provide direction, but the "growth" itself must come from private sector innovation and labor productivity. We are currently paying the price for years of "cheap money" and fiscal laxity. The current contractionary phase is the necessary detox. If we can maintain discipline to keep the deficit in check and the interest rates market-driven, the reward will be a Taka that holds its value and an economy that grows because it is efficient, not just because it is fueled by debt.
The writer is a banker and columnist.
© 2026 - All Rights with The Financial Express
