NEW YORK, Mar 28 (BBC): A majority of the American public, polls suggest, have been against the ongoing US-Israeli military campaign in Iran from the day it started.
Republicans, however, have largely stuck by their president as the war approaches the end of its fourth week. But that may be changing.
At the annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Texas, some of the party faithful expressed concern about why the US started this war, how Donald Trump is going to end it and whether the effort has been worth the costs.
"I just wish that there was more transparency on why we're doing what we're doing, that way you could send your loved one overseas and be OK with that," said Samantha Cassell. "I hope it comes to an end quick, because it's the cost of living, the oil and gas, the prices are only going to keep going up."
Cassell, who lives in Dallas, and her friend Joe Bolick were attending their first CPAC conference. He also had his doubts about the war.
"I don't see an endgame yet," he said. "What are we actually trying to achieve? Is it true regime change? What does that look like? Who to replace them? I think we kind of got ourselves stuck."
CPAC has been welcoming ground for Trump for a decade, shifting from a libertarian-leaning gathering to one dominated by Make America Great Again loyalists. The conservative conference has traditionally been held just outside Washington DC, but this year it moved to a sprawling hotel complex near Dallas, Texas.
The atmosphere at this year's conference was similar to the past. A cavernous main auditorium offered days full of panels and speakers. A floor below, the exhibit hall featured plenty of conservative kitsch - a bus with the president's face on it, Trump 2028 T-shirts and glasses commemorating the 2024 attempted assassination of Trump with "bulletproof" written on it and a faux bullet embedded in its side.
Some things were different, however. Even more than a thousand miles from Washington DC, the war in Iran was a common topic of conversation. And if there has been a recurring theme among the dozens of people interviewed by the BBC, it is that the conflict is creating a generational divide within conservative ranks.
Toby Blair, a 19-year-old college student at the University of South Florida, travelled to Dallas for CPAC with his friend Shashank Yalamanchi, a first-year law student. Neither said that they believed the Iran war was in America's best interests.
"I don't like that it's become America's job to find bad people and get rid of them," he said. "Especially when you have so many people at home that can't afford basic things like groceries and gas."
Yalamanchi said that many young conservatives supported Trump because he promised to avoid getting tangled in overseas wars - that he was a realist when it came to foreign policy, not an interventionist.
Two US Marine amphibious units are currently deploying to the Gulf. Elements of a US paratrooper division are also reportedly on their way. The Pentagon is also considering a $200bn request for war funding. All of this amounts to the prospect that, despite the president's assurances, the Iranian conflict may not end anytime soon.
"We have a lot of issues domestically that we need to handle, and when we're spending our time and effort justifying and fighting a foreign war, we have less time and effort to spend changing things here at home," he said.
The members of the "Trump Tribe of Texas" - wearing matching gold sequined jackets and necklaces spelling out the president's name - were an older crowd.
Its founder, Michael Manuel-Reaud, was attending his sixth CPAC and said Iran posed a danger that needed to be dealt with.
"If there's a threat for the United States getting bombed with a nuclear bomb, who can say no to that?" he asked. "[Trump] can't just quit. He's not going to stop until he finishes."
The rest of the tribe agreed. "I trust Trump to know what he's doing," said Penny Crosby. "I just think whatever Trump believes needs to happen, needs to happen to take care of the job.
"He's protecting us, protecting the American people," Blake Zummo said. "They're coming for us." If conference-goers here have been split over the war, on Thursday they were largely drowned out by vocal group of Iranian-Americans who have been boisterously celebrating the US military operation.
They chanted "Thank you Trump" during a morning panel featuring two women that had been injured in anti-regime protests in Iran. They filled the hallways with shouts of "regime change for Iran" while holding photographs of Reza Pahlavi, the son of the late Shah of Iran, who was deposed following the nation's 1979 Islamic revolution.
In the afternoon, the activists rallied outside the conference centre, waving Iranian lion-and-sun flags from the Shah's time as monarch.
"It's just so refreshing to see... the people of Iran finally having a shot at liberation after 47 years of oppression and tyranny under the Islamic regime," said Nima Poursohi, who was sporting a "Persians for Trump" T-shirt and a "Make America Great Again" hat with "Persian Excursion" embroidered on the side.
"No other president dealt with Iran or had even the courage to take a step forward like President Trump has," she said. The outpouring of emotion of Iranian-Americans at CPAC didn't surprise Matt Schlapp, the event's organiser.
"If you were deprived of freedom for a generation, you probably want to be pretty excited to get it back," he told the BBC. But he said there was "no guarantee" that would happen.
Schlapp, president of the American Conservative Union, has been running CPAC for 12 years. And he noted that - Iranian activists aside - there was a debate over where the war goes from here.
"Conservatives trust President Trump," he said. "They give him a lot of latitude. But behind that is some concern about where this goes." That concern wasn't just expressed among the rank-and-file at the conference. It also spilled out onto the conferences main stage.
On Thursday afternoon, former Congressman Matt Gaetz warned that, with thousands of new US soldiers heading to the Middle East, a ground invasion of Iran would make the US "poorer and less safe".
"It will mean higher gas prices higher food prices," he said, "and I'm not sure we would end up killing more terrorists than we would create."
© 2026 - All Rights with The Financial Express
